Random thoughts...
02:02 AM, 22 Aug 2007 by Michael Steigman Permalink | Comments (0)
Pitchfork Feature: Interview: Manu Chao [www.pitchforkmedia.com]
Pitchfork: So you don't have a problem with artists who don't use their platform to speak truth to power? Who remain silent?
MC: That's what I'm a little worried about. Of course, there are activists in the United States denouncing [the government], but it's not really massive, you know? For me it's really strange. The first thing I want to say is that I've got a French passport, and a Spanish passport, and in both countries our presidents are not very good presidents, too. But I'm so sure that in France or Spain, a President like Bush would get 100,000 [protestors] every week, in front of his house, to say no to him. And why not in the United States? Why are there so few people in front of the White House every day? It's not like Europe.
Whis is that? Many reasons, I'm sure; some self-evident. It's an interesting question to ponder in any case.
01:20 PM, 18 Aug 2007 by Michael Steigman Permalink | Comments (0)
43's Legacy
Watching Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and George Bush face the music and take their thumpin' over the past few weeks hasn't been nearly as enjoyable as it should have been. Time after time, we've seen the threesome loose, giddy and nonchalant. Something just did not seem right. Slowly, in the days after the election, opinion pieces started appearing from liberal bastions such as Salon.com talking about how Bush was turning around his presidency with the firing of Rumsfeld the nomination of a competent replacement and the talk of bipartisanship. There were complaints from Republicans about the timing of Rumsfeld dismissal, that their campaigns would have been so much easier had Rumsfeld been sacked a month earlier. We now know that Bush had made up his mind to sack Rumsfeld well in advance of the election. So, the question we have to ask ourselves is "why didn't Bush can Rumsfeld earlier to save his party the beating it took?". Do you buy his "didn't want to inject a major decision about this war in the final days of a campaign" alibi? I don't. The Dem's sweep in the elections and Rumsfeld's firing has put Bush in a new light and I don't think it's an accident at all. Bush is now the underdog and Iraq's now the Dem's mess. I think Rove realized that there was no way out for Bush and the administration without the Dems taking congress.
10:42 PM, 27 Nov 2006 by Michael Steigman Permalink | Comments (0)